Our new Chancellor, Philip Hammond, looks like a considered man and one hopes that he will be able to \u2018kick away\u2019 some of the \u2018old baggage\u2019 left there by the discredited former Chancellor, George Osborne. Below, is my wish list for the forthcoming Autumn Statement.<\/p>\n
Stamp Duty<\/strong><\/p>\n Now that we can study the Treasury earnings for a full year of the new Stamp Duty regime, initiated in the Autumn Statement of 2014, as we suspected, there is a drop in Tax Receipts. Income is up over \u00a31million but substantially down below this as the former Chancellor designed an \u2018Election bribe\u2019 to help the Party\u2019s electoral prospects. This further excited an already \u2018frenzied\u2019 market place that served to disenfranchise the vulnerable first time buyer \u2013 not very clever.<\/p>\n Whilst tax receipts in the higher tax brackets are greater, turnover is down by 60% and you can see the effect of this on the earnings of the PLC estate agents and house builders.<\/span><\/p>\n If you remove the surge from the \u2018Buy-to-Let tax watershed\u2019 at the end of March 2016 the overall Receipts will be even lower.<\/span><\/p>\n The 3% additional Stamp Duty Tax on second homes and Buy-to-Let investors has had the most damning effect and, in my view, is the most likely to be changed in the forthcoming Autumn Statement. Are you listening Mr. Hammond?<\/span><\/p>\n All of this interference has created a \u2018lop-sided\u2019 market place with all manner of repercussions for Treasury Receipts and the broader economy generally.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Osborne always believed in \u2018shock and awe\u2019 and was not known for his \u2018deftness of touch\u2019 and this may be a perfect opportunity for the new Chancellor to \u2018re-set\u2019 these taxes at a lower level and, by doing so, will stimulate activity and may well raise more money for the Treasury at the same time.<\/span><\/p>\n Of all taxes, Stamp Duty is the most perfectly avoidable one. \u00a0You just don\u2019t move and you don\u2019t have to pay it! Stagnant markets are not good for the country, as the health and vigour of the Residential Property Market is one of the main drivers of the UK Economy as a whole and a much-needed one in the post Brexit environment.<\/span><\/p>\n Chancellor, if it is too politically unacceptable to change the scale of Stamp Duty at the upper end, what about my proposal that the seller and buyer share the 12% Stamp Duty liability between them? I.e. that they should both pay 6% each.<\/span><\/p>\n Whilst the seller, in this instance, will not be \u2018delighted\u2019 about this additional tax, the purchaser may be induced by the lower tax rate and this could stimulate the otherwise soporific market place. Property values may well rise as a result and the Treasury could get more by way of Tax Receipts. \u00a0This could be a \u2018win,win\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n Corporation Tax<\/strong><\/p>\n In the post Brexit era the UK should be considered \u2018treasure island\u2019 and we need to encourage the national and international companies who want to invest here to take advantage of our discounted currency and our deregulated, less bureaucratic, post Brexit economy. \u00a0This should be reduced to 15% or below and before we know it, the likes of Starbucks, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple etc., will soon be \u2018swanning over\u2019 to share the \u2018booty\u2019 away from the draconian corporation tax regimes of the USA and Europe, which are set at a ludicrously high level of 35%. It will irritate competing \u00a0countries but this is an incidental benefit.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Regulation<\/strong><\/p>\n Lest we forget, it was the German Trade Minister, Ludwig Erhard who, after the war, de-regulated Germany and allowed its economy to soar to its gargantuan present status, so much so, that rationing ended six months after the War, whilst \u2018victorious Britain\u2019 had to suffer this affliction for six years as the UK was so \u2018ham strung\u2019 by its own regulations at the time.<\/p>\n In the post Brexit era we have an opportunity to \u2018re-write the rule book\u2019 so let\u2019s take a \u2018sledge hammer\u2019 to all this \u2018red tape\u2019 and bureaucracy which has \u2018wafted\u2019 over like a \u2018locust storm\u2019 from Brussels. \u00a0Countries that are de-regulated thrive and those that do not, or cannot, release themselves from these \u2018shackles\u2019, usually suffocate under their own weight.<\/span><\/p>\n Building More Homes<\/strong><\/p>\n \u2018For Pete’ s sake\u2019, we urgently need reform of the local borough planning processes. \u00a0It is rife with petty politics, nimbyism, localism, bureaucracy and mindless ecological and environmentalist issues and all this conspires against the efficient management of planning consents for worthy development schemes. This has resulted in the building in the UK of less than a third of the private and public sector housing that this country needs for its wellbeing and social stability. We need a radical re-think here and if this means that the Department of the Environment (DOE) should take charge of these matters in place of the councils, then so be it.<\/p>\n Extending Help-to-Buy is a good thing and perhaps there should be greater funds for housing associations to build more affordable homes on brown field, if not green field sites and certainly we need to utilise redundant land owned by governmental departments.<\/span><\/p>\n To be fair, councils should be able to keep more of the receipts from the sale of excess council homes than the third share they enjoy at present. This will encourage them to release money in redundant assets and that can be used to much greater effect.<\/span><\/p>\n Pensions<\/strong><\/p>\n The temptation to reform the private pension schemes from \u2018non-taxed in\u2019 and \u2018taxed-out\u2019 to \u2018taxed-in\u2019 and \u2018non-taxed out\u2019 will be a great cash flow boost for the Treasury. \u00a0Osborne wanted to do it in spring of this year, but was prevented from doing so by his political \u2018spin masters\u2019, for fear of middle class retribution at the Referendum.<\/span><\/p>\n This would be a huge windfall for the Treasury, but at the same time a further burden on the Middle Classes who, after all, should represent the \u2018heartland\u2019 of Tory support. \u00a0It\u2019s all \u2018fine and dandy\u2019 for Mrs. May to demonstrate a centralist, if not left wing bent, but she should not, at the same time, forget \u2018what has put the food on the table for Tory politicians.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n The reason why people turned to Buy-to-Let investments was to protect their family’s future and all the more so, since private and public pensions have become such feeble alternatives of late. Since private pensions have been taxed so heavily by the \u2018feckless\u2019 Chancellor Osborne and his Labour predecessors, I think this is one reform which should be passed over, since there is only so much that the middle class electorate should shoulder by way of burden.<\/span><\/p>\n What About The Poor Savers?<\/strong><\/p>\n We all understand the reason for lower Interest rates and the need to keep the Economy buoyant in the post-Brexit era, but returns on savings, particularly for pensioners and retirees, is a major problem and somehow needs to be addressed. \u00a0Surely, a generous tax break could be introduced that will help alleviate the pain somewhat!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Business Rates<\/strong><\/p>\n Retail businesses, particularly in London that, after all provides 30% of GDP, have been hit hard by the relentless rising of business rates, rent and salaries. The explosion of E-commerce, with its negligible overheads, has exacerbated this process and unless the Chancellor does something about this hindrance, before we look around, the High Street will be full of caf\u00e9s, mobile phone shops and \u2018pop up\u2019 charity outlets where former thriving private businesses have failed. This affects diversity and, let\u2019s not forget, the High Street is effectively the \u2018beating heart\u2019 of a healthy and vibrant community.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Non-Doms<\/strong><\/p>\n The \u2018moral repugnancy\u2019 often expounded by Osborne which morphed \u00a0\u2018tax avoidance\u2019 into \u2018tax evasion\u2019 (which hitherto was a perfectly acceptable custom) as well as the changes to the Non Dom Taxation requirements, has resulted in an exodus of wealth creators leaving these shores for no material gain to this country whatsoever. \u00a0The Treasury has not earned a penny from this and given that 95% of Non Doms were taxpayers either in the UK or other jurisdictions i.e. the USA (where US citizens are taxed worldwide) it represents mindless \u2018pseudo socialism\u2019 gone mad! \u00a0Taxes are there to raise money, not to penalise success and this 200-year-old tax law served to help to make London the \u2018greatest city on earth\u2019, populated by icons of industry and commerce, where there is almost full employment.<\/p>\n Mr. Hammond needs to look at this again, in the light of the \u2018unforeseen circumstances\u2019 that have resulted with this foolhardy tax change with no apparent gain for the Treasury or the UK for that matter.<\/span><\/p>\n A repeal of this law will certainly encourage some entrepreneurs to stay here who, otherwise, may feel tempted by the beckoning overtures of Frankfurt, which the Germans would love to make the new financial hub of Europe, in place of London, after Brexit. Even the \u2018arch socialist\u2019 M. Hollande is now trying to tempt back these high net worth individuals to France with enticing tax schemes.<\/span><\/p>\n Heathrow\/HS2<\/strong><\/p>\n For \u2018heavens sake\u2019 let’s get on with the third runway at Heathrow and be done with it! \u00a0Zak and Boris were hamstrung by their own self-defeating convictions on these politically and environmentally charged subjects. The sooner that we clear the blockage here, the better … we have the \u2018greatest city on earth\u2019, Terminal 5 is world class, so let’s get on and increase the capacity and forget about the \u2018hellhole\u2019 of Gatwick, which even off-duty BA employees try to avoid \u2018like the plague\u2019. \u00a0We need this and HS2, to stimulate the capital projects of the UK in order to reflate our economy and make it a better place for all of us to live as a thriving, thrusting, 21st<\/sup> Century economy of the future.<\/p>\n Royal Yacht Britannia<\/strong><\/p>\n The Royal Yacht, Britannia was not so much a spectacle of avarice and \u2018embarras de richesses\u2019 but it embodied the wonderful heritage and pageantry that the Monarchy represents in the world. \u00a0Captains of industry, dignitaries, Prime Ministers and Presidents of many foreign countries were \u2018courted and f\u00eated\u2019 on board and goodness knows how much valuable business and foreign earnings were ensnared for the benefit of the UK as a result. Ignore the bearded, open sandaled, vegan leftists telling us that this is an unacceptable vestige of a bygone era. \u00a0What a load of ‘hog wash’! \u00a0Mr. Hammond, please re-commission this historic trophy or sanction the re-building of a new one and let us have, once more, a living example of the emerging \u2018phoenix from the ashes\u2019 of the EU in the post Brexit world and lets show them how proud we are to be part of this enterprising, innovative nation which was once ‘the greatest empire on earth’ but still is very relevant with an important part to play in todays world.<\/span><\/p>\n Finally<\/strong><\/p>\n Now that Mr. Hammond has made it quite clear that he will relax the deficit reduction programme towards 2020, there is a golden opportunity to \u2018plough back\u2019 some monies into the UK, so that it can continue to be one of the fastest moving economies in the G7. Despite all the predictions to the contrary the UK has confounded the financial analysts and the Institutions who had \u2018written us off\u2019 after the June referendum result.<\/span><\/p>\n We are a proud, successful nation so let’s think \u00a0and act like one!<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Our new Chancellor, Philip Hammond, looks like a considered man and one hopes that he will be able to \u2018kick away\u2019 some of the \u2018old baggage\u2019 left there by the discredited former Chancellor, George Osborne. Below, is my wish list … Continue reading